AVIF vs PNG
Side-by-side comparison of features, use cases, performance, quality, and compatibility.
AVIF and PNG are not interchangeable for every task. This page summarizes practical differences so you can pick the right format or conversion path before export.
Comparison table
| Aspect | AVIF | PNG |
|---|---|---|
| Compression | Lossy | Lossless |
| Transparency | No | Yes |
| Animation | Static | Static |
| Data type | Raster | Raster |
| Typical file size | Medium to small | Larger for flat art |
| Browser support | Modern — growing | Very broad |
Pros
AVIF: Strong web compression
PNG: Transparency and crisp edges
Cons
AVIF: Weaker legacy support
PNG: Not ideal for every task
Use cases
Use AVIF when next-gen web delivery with strong compression.
Use PNG when logos, UI assets, and transparent graphics.
Convert locally when a platform or client requires PNG.
Performance
AVIF decodes well in modern browsers.
PNG may use more memory.
Test one file before large batches.
Quality
Start from the highest-quality source you have.
Do not re-save through multiple lossy formats.
Compare sharpness on your actual display before publishing.
Browser compatibility
AVIF support: Modern — growing.
PNG support: Very broad.
Test output in Chrome, Safari, and Firefox before publishing.
Recommended workflow
Decide whether the deliverable needs AVIF or PNG.
Open the related converter or tool below.
Tune quality or DPI when available.
Download and verify on the target device.
Frequently asked questions
Is AVIF better than PNG?
Not always — AVIF fits some use cases and PNG fits others. See the table above.
How do I convert AVIF to PNG locally?
Use the related converters below; files are processed in your browser.
Do I need desktop software?
No — related tools run in a modern browser.